How Will You Vote Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

How Will You Vote - analyse ExampleThe applicant were right in their petition saying that if we totallyow even the Gay alliance for Same Sex Marriage to hold public assemblies, why not the Hampton roadstead international jihad. Giving of pamphlets and prop public demonstrations are all preserved in the International Covenant on Civil and policy-making Rights (Article 21) which states that The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the make out of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interest of national security or public safety (ordre public), the security system of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedom of others (icnl.org). If Hampton Roads Jihad had passed all the scrutiny, submitted necessary requirements and paid the permit cost of $97,500, then in that location will be no resolve why the permit-issuing body which is th e urban center Councilshould block the permit applicant in proceeding with the public assembly. It is the craft of the members of the City Council to scrutinize and to consequently approve permits to hold public assembly of applicants if they laboriously went through the series of procedures and if they meant to do it peaceably on the appointed date and place. If there are sign onures by the public for the City Council to prohibit the Hampton Roads Jihad, it is the duty of the state to implement what has been approved and to put in place safety measures and contingencies that would avoid acts of violations by groups critical towards the demonstrators. Besides, the Hampton Roads Jihad has many options to contest unfavorable decisions in the high authorities aside from the local City Council. On the other hand, if the demonstration goes awry, it is the time to disperse the members of Hampton Roads Jihad to further avoid any damages to public property and national security. Indee d, it is righteous not to allow demonstrators who are past criminals, themselves, to hold public demonstrations. But Hampton Roads Jihad, if they are to be believed, plainly filed for a permit to public demonstration just to commemorate Osama lay in Ladens birthday. Ultimately, there is nothing wrong with that. No reason why we shouldnt allow them. To say that since they believe Bin Laden, then they share the acts of Bin Laden is a misconception. The Hampton Roads Jihad has the right to uphold their persuasion in Osama Bin Laden, and no entity has the right to challenge their sentiment on public discourse but for the sake of and during discussions. This is preserved in the freedom of expression and of the press, and to violate this is tantamount to a great disservice to America. It is all clear in the First Am discontinuement of the United States carte du jour of Rights which declares that Congress shall not make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting t he free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. (Amendment I, US Bill of Rights) To vote favorably for Hampton Roads Jihad could be a great challenge that would spell the end of my career as member of a local City Council in a US grime which was once the primary target of Osama Bin Laden-led 9/11 attacks. But to prohibit the Hampton Roads Jihad in proceeding with their demonstration is a great disservice